Tag: fishing

  • Coastal tourism: questions and answers

    Coastal tourism: questions and answers

    Marine & Coastal Culture Tourism in Northern Territories

    Conference that focused on the fishing environment in northern territories took place in the University of Akureyri, 18 – 19 June 2013. The conference was organized by the Stefansson Arctic Institute in collaboration with the University of Akureyri Research Center, NORA, the Iclandic Tourism Research Center, Norwegian Seafood Center and the Icelandic Lighthouse Society.

    Marine and coastal culture tourism is growing in popularity in various ways. Some tourists want to learn about life in coastal villages, experience nature and tranquility as well as the wilderness. Others want to experience the excitement of driving charter boats, diving, surfing, go speed boating or hiring a boat and try their luck at fishing. Then there are those who want to sail from port to port and country to country on board gigantic cruise ships.

    How does this fit in with cultural heritage, everyday life, social development, self-sufficiency, fishing quotas and environmental policies of the Nordic nations? How can the Nordic nations collaborate in this area? Do these diverse aspects of tourism have collaborative opportunities? These challenges were discussed at the conference where further questions were pondered through group work and perhaps more answers and collaborative possibilities found.

    Source

    Stefansson Arctic Institute

  • Invitation to Iceland

    Invitation to Iceland

    Northern Iceland

    Marine and Coastal Culture Tourism in Northern Territories – Akureyri Iceland – 18-19th June

    A conference that will focus on the fishing environment in northern territories will take place in the University of Akureyri, 18-19 June 2013. The conference is organised by the Stefansson Arctic Institute in collaboration with the University of Akureyri Research Centre, NORA, the Icelandic Tourism Research Centre, Norwegian Seafood Centre and the Icelandic Lighthouse Society.

    Marine and coastal culture tourism is growing in popularity in various ways. Some tourists want to learn about life in coastal villages, experience nature and tranquility as well as the wilderness. Others want to experience the excitement of driving charter boats, diving, surfing, go speedboating or hiring a boat and try their luck at fishing. Then there are those who want to sail from port to port and country to country on board gigantic cruise ships.

    How does this fit in with cultural heritage, everyday life, social development, self sufficiency, fishing quotas and environmental policies of the Nordic nations? How can the Nordic nations collaborate in this area? Do these diverse aspects of tourism have collaborative opportunities? These challenges will be discussed at the conference where further questions will be pondered through group work and perhaps more answers and collaborative possibilites found.

    Skogafoss in the south of Iceland

    The main workshop themes will be how we meet the challenges of:

    • The development of marine and coastal culture tourism in Norway, Iceland, Greenland and the Faroe Islands.
    • Opportunities and threats, self sufficiency and environment – the effect of marine and coastal culture tourism and the image of the Northern Territories.
    • In what areas can we collaborate?

    There will also be excursions where tourism related businesses and museums will be visited.

    See the conference program.

    The conference is open to all but registration is needed for planning purposes.

    Registration deadline: 10 May 2013

    Conference fee: ISK 12000 / DKK 545

    Registration & hotel bookings (limited vacancy): conference@aktravel.is, tel. +354 4600600

    For further information contact Sigurbjörg Árnadóttir: sibba@svs.is.

    Source

    Stefansson Arctic Institute

  • Disputes and the agreement of High Seas Fishing

    In the decade following the adoption of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, fishing on the high seas became a major international problem.

    The Convention gave all States the freedom to fish without regulations on the high seas, but coastal States, to which the Law of the Sea conferred exclusive economic rights, including the right to fish within 200 miles off their shores, began to complain that fleets fishing on the high seas were reducing catches in their domestic waters.

    The problem centred on fish populations that “straddle” the boundaries of countries’ 200-mile exclusive economic zones (EEZs), such as cod off Canada’s eastern coast and pollack in the Bering Sea, and highly migratory species like tuna and swordfish, which move between EEZs and the high seas.

    By the early 1990s, most stocks of commercially valued fish were running low, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). As catches became smaller, coastal States complained that the industrial-scale fishing operations of the so-called “distant-water” States on the high seas were undermining their efforts to conserve and revitalize fish stocks within the EEZs.

    Reports of violence between fishing vessels from coastal and distant-water States became increasingly frequent, especially during the “cod wars” of the 1970s. Several countries, including Britain and Norway, sent naval ships to protect fishing fleets on the high seas. Spanish fishers clashed with British and French driftnetters in what came to be known as the “tuna wars”.

    Before the UN Agreement on Straddling and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks was finalized in October 1995, several coastal States had fired shots at foreign fleets. In the northern Atlantic, Canada seized and confiscated a Spanish boat and crew fishing in international waters just beyond the Canadian 200-mile limit.

    The coastal States most concerned during the negotiations about the impact of high seas fishing on their domestic harvest include Argentina, Australia, Canada, Chile, Iceland and New Zealand.
    Six countries are responsible for 90 per cent of “distant-water” fishing: Russia, Japan, Spain, Poland, the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan province of China. The United States also does a significant amount of high-seas fishing, especially for tuna, and in recent years China has become a major fishing nation.

    At the Earth Summit — the UN Conference on Environment and Development, held in Rio de Janeiro in June 1992–Governments called on the United Nations to find ways to conserve fish stocks and prevent international conflicts over fishing on the high seas. The UN

    Conference on Straddling and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks held its first full meeting in July 1993. After six negotiating sessions, a legally binding Agreement was opened for signing on 4 December 1995.

    “This Agreement gives us a tool for winning the battle to save the world’s fish”, Ambassador Satya N. Nandan of Fiji, the Conference Chairman, said at the close of the talks. “It confers on States both the right to fish and the obligation to manage fish stocks sustainably.”

    The treaty

    • Establishes the basis for the sustainable management and conservation of the world’s fisheries;
    • Addresses the problem of inadequate data on fish stocks;
    • Provides for the establishment of quotas;
    • Calls for the setting up of regional fishing organizations where none exist;
    • Tackles problems caused by the persistence of unauthorized fishing;
    • Sets out procedures for ensuring compliance with its provisions, including the right to board and inspect vessels belonging to other States; and
    • Prescribes options for the compulsory and binding peaceful settlement of disputes between States.

    Source: United Nations website

  • Value of fisheries

    Fish export value by countries

    Fishing is the most important economy in Greenland, and a huge factor in Iceland.

    Although the numbers might not be as big in value as in Canada and Russia for example, fishing in Greenland counts for a total of 94% of the countries economy. Shrimps are 63% of that number.

    Comparison between the numbers in tons can bee seen here.

    Iceland exports fish in large style, but aluminum is another big export value.

    Other Arctic countries are all around 1% of fisheries regarding export value.

    In USA the number is around half a percent, but closer to 1.5 in Russia.

    The picture on the right shows the importance of fishing in the Arctic, where Greenland and Iceland stand out.