Category: News & Press Releases

Arctic Portal News Portlet

  • Disputes and the agreement of High Seas Fishing

    In the decade following the adoption of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, fishing on the high seas became a major international problem.

    The Convention gave all States the freedom to fish without regulations on the high seas, but coastal States, to which the Law of the Sea conferred exclusive economic rights, including the right to fish within 200 miles off their shores, began to complain that fleets fishing on the high seas were reducing catches in their domestic waters.

    The problem centred on fish populations that “straddle” the boundaries of countries’ 200-mile exclusive economic zones (EEZs), such as cod off Canada’s eastern coast and pollack in the Bering Sea, and highly migratory species like tuna and swordfish, which move between EEZs and the high seas.

    By the early 1990s, most stocks of commercially valued fish were running low, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). As catches became smaller, coastal States complained that the industrial-scale fishing operations of the so-called “distant-water” States on the high seas were undermining their efforts to conserve and revitalize fish stocks within the EEZs.

    Reports of violence between fishing vessels from coastal and distant-water States became increasingly frequent, especially during the “cod wars” of the 1970s. Several countries, including Britain and Norway, sent naval ships to protect fishing fleets on the high seas. Spanish fishers clashed with British and French driftnetters in what came to be known as the “tuna wars”.

    Before the UN Agreement on Straddling and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks was finalized in October 1995, several coastal States had fired shots at foreign fleets. In the northern Atlantic, Canada seized and confiscated a Spanish boat and crew fishing in international waters just beyond the Canadian 200-mile limit.

    The coastal States most concerned during the negotiations about the impact of high seas fishing on their domestic harvest include Argentina, Australia, Canada, Chile, Iceland and New Zealand.
    Six countries are responsible for 90 per cent of “distant-water” fishing: Russia, Japan, Spain, Poland, the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan province of China. The United States also does a significant amount of high-seas fishing, especially for tuna, and in recent years China has become a major fishing nation.

    At the Earth Summit — the UN Conference on Environment and Development, held in Rio de Janeiro in June 1992–Governments called on the United Nations to find ways to conserve fish stocks and prevent international conflicts over fishing on the high seas. The UN

    Conference on Straddling and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks held its first full meeting in July 1993. After six negotiating sessions, a legally binding Agreement was opened for signing on 4 December 1995.

    “This Agreement gives us a tool for winning the battle to save the world’s fish”, Ambassador Satya N. Nandan of Fiji, the Conference Chairman, said at the close of the talks. “It confers on States both the right to fish and the obligation to manage fish stocks sustainably.”

    The treaty

    • Establishes the basis for the sustainable management and conservation of the world’s fisheries;
    • Addresses the problem of inadequate data on fish stocks;
    • Provides for the establishment of quotas;
    • Calls for the setting up of regional fishing organizations where none exist;
    • Tackles problems caused by the persistence of unauthorized fishing;
    • Sets out procedures for ensuring compliance with its provisions, including the right to board and inspect vessels belonging to other States; and
    • Prescribes options for the compulsory and binding peaceful settlement of disputes between States.

    Source: United Nations website

  • Management of Arctic Fisheries

    EEZ-zones

    Coastal states have their maritime zones where they have exclusive access to all resources. The map on the right shows these zones.

    The zone stretches from the seaward edge of the state’s territorial sea out to 200 nautical miles from its coast (370,4 km). The states have the rights to fish in the EEZ, but also many duties, like preventing overfishing and pollution.

    Fisheries conservation and management authorities, most frequently a Ministry of Fisheries, often make use of the following substantive standards:

    1. Restrictions on catch and effort, for instance by setting the total allowable catch (TAC) and allocating the TAC by means of national quotas.
    2. Minimum size limits for target species.
    3. Maximum by-catch limits, for instance in terms of the number of individuals (e.g. in relation to marine turtles and marine mammals) or as a percentage of the target catch.
    4. Technical measures, for instance minimum mesh sizes,  by-catch mitigation techniques (e.g. turtle excluder devices, bird-scaring lines).
    5. Spatial measures (e.g. closed areas) aimed at avoiding catch of target species (e.g. nursing and spawning areas) or non-target species (e.g. important feedings areas) or avoiding impact on sensitive habitat (e.g. cold water coral reefs).

    There are numbers of intergovernmental bodies who are relevant to fisheries in the Arctic.

    The two biggest ones are perhaps the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA).

    The Fisheries and Aquaculture Department of FAO has the vision of “a world in which responsible and sustainable use of fisheries and aquaculture resources makes an appreciable contribution to human well-being, food security and poverty alleviation.”

    It´s mission is “to strengthen global governance and the managerial and technical capacities of members and to lead consensus-building towards improved conservation and utilization of aquatic resources.”

    The UNGA has many agreements related to the oceans, like the United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea and the Agreement on High Seas Fishing, relating to the conservation and management of straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks.

    Read more about the agreement here on the Arctic Portal website.

    At the regional level, there are a number of RFMO´s and bilateral or regional organizations/arrangements whose spatial scope overlaps to some extent with the Arctic marine area.

  • Climate change and Fisheries

    Dried fish, traditional produce in Lofoten, Norway

    The relationship between the physical effects of climate change and effects on the ecosystem is complex. It is impossible to tell what climate change will to do biological resources in the Arctic.

    Many ideas have been set forward in the main consequences of climate change to the Arctic marine area.

    This highlights some of these thoughts:

    1. Climate change is a much more rapid warming of the Arctic surface temperatures in comparison with the rest of the world. As a consequence, Arctic waters will warm more rapidly as well.
    2. Climate change will lead to substantial reductions of Arctic sea ice coverage and thickness.
    3. Reduced salinity due to influx of fresh water as a consequence of melting sea ice (which is essentially salt free) and glacial ice.
    4. Other oceanographic and meteorological  changes (e.g. more storms and waves) in particular due to changes in air and water temperature and sea ice coverage.
    5. Increasing acidification of the world’s oceans due to increasing uptake of CO2 (which is not just relevant to the Arctic marine area).

    One general conclusion to what climate change will do is that “moderate warming will improve the conditions for some of the most important commercial fish stocks, as well as for aquaculture. This is most likely to be due to enhanced levels of primary and secondary production resulting from reduced sea-ice cover and more extensive habitat areas for subarctic species such as cod and herring. Global warming is also likely to induce an ecosystem regime shift in some areas, resulting in a very different species composition.”

    The composition of Arctic marine ecosystems will undoubtedly change, both qualitatively and quantitatively. Some species will at some stage disappear and others (e.g. due to northward migration) will be added and the relative importance of species in abundance will change as well. These changes will of course be spatially and temporally differentiated. Where new fishing opportunities will occur (on the high seas or within coastal state maritime zones) and with respect to which species or categories of species (e.g. shared, anadromous, straddling or highly migratory) is also difficult to predict.

    Similarly which states – Arctic Ocean coastal states or other states – will benefit or suffer and how subsistence fishing will be affected, among other things by competition with commercial fisheries. Finally, as reduced ice overage and thickness will also enable other human activities – most importantly shipping and offshore hydrocarbon activities – these activities may compete with fishing in a spatial sense or affect them by pollution and other impacts.
    The impact of current and future Arctic fisheries on the marine environment and marine biodiversity in the Arctic is not likely to be fundamentally different from impacts to the marine environment and biodiversity in other parts of the globe. Arctic fisheries could lead to overexploitation of target species and a variety of impacts on non-target species, for instance on dependent species due to predator-prey relationships, on associated species due to by-catch and on benthic species due to bottom fishing techniques.

    Fishing nets

    In view of the broad spatial scope of the Arctic marine area, such undesirable effects are without doubt already occurring, even though not necessarily on a very serious scale.

    The effects of a temperature rise on the production by the stocks of fish and marine mammals presently inhabiting the area are more uncertain. These depend on how a temperature increase is accompanied by changes in ocean circulation patterns and thus plankton transport and production. In the past, recruitment to several fish stocks in the area, cod and herring in particular, has shown a positive correlation with increasing temperature.

    This was due to higher survival rates of larvae and fry, which in turn resulted from increased food availability. Food is transported into the area via inflows of Atlantic water, which have also caused the ocean temperature to increase. Hence, high recruitment in fish is associated with higher water temperature but is not caused by the higher water temperature itself.

    Provided that the fluctuations in Atlantic inflows to the area are maintained along with a general warming of the North Atlantic waters, it is likely that annual average recruitment of herring and cod will be at about the long-term average until around 2020 to 2030.This projection is also based on the assumption that harvest rates are kept at levels that maintain spawning stocks well above the level at which recruitment is impaired.
    How production will change further into the future is impossible to guess, since the projected temperatures, particularly for some of the global models, are so high that species composition and thus

    the interactions in the ecosystem may change completely.

    Conclusion:

    • Climate change will affect fisheries
    • The extent is impossible to predict
    • Already happening, but not on a serious scale
    • Some species might dissapear and other might migrate to the Arctic
    • The effect on marine mammals is unknown

    Source: Arctic Transform & ACIA report

  • New oil state program in Russia

    Energy pipes

    The government of Russia has finalized a state program for oil and gas exploration. The project is worth around 225-250 billion USD, the government putting in around 40 billion USD.

    The program is scheduled to run to 2030 and aims to provide an “energetically safe development of the national economy” through production of 40-80 million tons of oil and 190-210 billion cubic meters of gas per year.

    That counts for 8-16% of the current level of oil production and 32-35% of gas production in Russia, according to the Barents Observer.

    The state program is yet to be recognized by the president of Russia but a decision is to be made in November.

    Interest in exploration in the Russian waters is huge but according to the ministry, development of most projects is “economically inefficient” under the current legislation.

    The main causes that are hampering development are lack of funding for exploration, poor infrastructure development and presence of administrative barriers.

    The new state program is set to change that.

  • Overview of Arctic Fishing

    Traditional fishing in Greenland

    The civilizations of northern Europe commercialized fishing, taking cod and herring in the seas off Norway and European Russia. During the past and recent years the Arctic and the Sub-Arctic was and will be a valuable food production area and has supplied over the years valuable nutrition for the south.

    Historically the Arctic supported the urbanization of the south, providing the cities with oil from whale and shark products that was used for lamp posts, production of soap, and for lubrication of machinery of the industrial revolution.

    Arctic fishermen and whalers of the past are long known for their overfishing and whaling. Oil was a valuable product and in high demand in the beginning of the industrial revolution.

    The cod fisheries in the Canadian Grand Banks became available as soon as the vessels where good enough. Naturally fishing increased with better technology and the when exports were more frequent.

    This even led to over fishing in the Arctic, especially in the Barents Sea and the northern Norwegian Sea, in the second half of the 20th century.

    The fishing fleets in Norway and Russia turned to capelin but déjà vu, the stocks were overharvested in a few years.

    Conservation measures have seen the stocks strengthened but the stock in the Barents Sea has gained ground again.

    Around Iceland, a big fishing nation, the stocks have also collapsed but are not in any danger. Iceland still relies heavily in fishing, but not as much as before.

    Fishing in the Bering Sea has come under scrutiny in recent years because of its potential involvement in the decline in the number of Sea Otters and pinnipeds.

    Traditional racks for the drying of cod

    Historically, fishing for salmon species, herring and halibut have been important.

    Visitors to south-western Alaska need only read the menu if a local restaurant to recognize that salmon and halibut are a source of local pride, and catching of those species are a popular tourist attraction.

    Salmon fishing is also important in the Russian side of the sea as well as for Japanese trawlers.

    In the 1970 and 1980s the fishing of the Walleye Pollock increased dramatically, with annual catches of up to 20 million tones eventually being recorded.

    However catching then dropped sharply n the area, probably because of overfishing and the rise in water temperature.

    Fisheries in the Arctic have changed significantly throughout the history where subsistence based fisheries have been the core value. The catch from the sea has made the Arctic and the Sub-Arctic area inhabitable due to the abundance of nutrition from both fishes and sea mammals. Those species made life in the cold bearable.

    During the recent years, an understanding of the importance of the biodiversity in the Arctic has increased. Regulations, quotas and bans of fishing and hunting have been implemented in order to preserve the delicate Arctic environment.

  • Atlantic Ocean species Catch

    Species in the western Atlantic Ocean

    Five species fill up just over 50 percent of the fisheries in the northwest Atlantic Ocean.

    The Northern prawn is the biggest factor, counting for 17% of the total catch.

    The American sea scallop is the sexond biggest factor, 14% and the Atlantic herring is at 11%. The Atlantic menhaden is at 10%.

    The picture on the rights shows the number for 2008.

    In the northeast Atlantic Ocean, which stretches around Europe, the Atlantic herring is by far the biggest factor. It counts for almost 30% of the total catch.

    The blue whiting, is also popular, at 16% and the Atlantic cod is only at 9%.

    Catch by species in the northeast

    Herring is the biggest factor in the northeastern part. Along with blue whitting and the cod they count up for 50% of the total catch.

    Six other species fill up approximately 25% of the total catch, the Atlantic mackerel, European sprat, aithe (Pollock), Sandeels (Sandlances), Haddock and Capelin.

    Others are numerous but count for much less.

    The Atlantic herring is important both in the east and the west, but other species are not as connected between the two sides.

  • Value of fisheries

    Fish export value by countries

    Fishing is the most important economy in Greenland, and a huge factor in Iceland.

    Although the numbers might not be as big in value as in Canada and Russia for example, fishing in Greenland counts for a total of 94% of the countries economy. Shrimps are 63% of that number.

    Comparison between the numbers in tons can bee seen here.

    Iceland exports fish in large style, but aluminum is another big export value.

    Other Arctic countries are all around 1% of fisheries regarding export value.

    In USA the number is around half a percent, but closer to 1.5 in Russia.

    The picture on the right shows the importance of fishing in the Arctic, where Greenland and Iceland stand out.

  • Catch by Countries

    Fisheries in tons for the past 60 years.

    Here is a graph that shows how much six Arctic states caught. The numbers do not include whaling, but the numbers are in tons.

    The numbers date back from 1950, except for Russia.

    This shows the biggest fishing nations in the Arctic.

    It shows very well that USA is the biggest fishing nation, somewhat a surprise for many.

    Russia is also very big in numbers, especially in 1990.

    It is very interesting to compare this to the importance of fishing for the countries, and the export numbers. It shows that although both USA and Russia are hunting a lot, it is not very important for their economy.

  • Environmental study in Jan Mayen

    Environmental study in Jan Mayen

    Map of Jan Mayen and the Exclusive Economic Zones around the island and the EEZ´s of the neighbouring countries.

    Environmental study of proposed oil drilling near Jan Mayen will proceed in the near future, despite strong opposition of environmentalist, according to Reuters.
    Jan Mayen is a Norwegian archipelago north of Iceland. The Map shows the EEZ around Jan Mayen, which Norway is entitled to.

    Ola Borten Moe, Minister of Petroleum and Energy in Norway, confirmed that formal studies and reports will go ahead.

    “An impact assessment of Jan Mayen is … important,” Moe said in a statement. “It will cast light on important aspects of opening up for petroleum activities.”

    The length of the study is still unknown but if there are no major environmental or other hurdles, oil companies could be licensed to look for reserves across 100,000 sq km (38,600 square miles) of ocean.

    The last time a new area was opened to exploration in Norwegian territorial waters was 1994, the ministry said.

    Oil reserves are thought to be in the area, Iceland is also hoping to discover oil in the Dreki area, close to Jan Mayen. Iceland has invited for bids for oil search in the area, the bidding closes in February 2012.

  • Fishing Graphs

    Division of the Pacific and Atlantic oceans

    The eight Arctic states all catch fish. The species and quantity naturally varies between them.

    In this section comparison is shown between the states, where they are fishing, what and how much.

    Fishing is a part of every nations export value, but the difference is staggering. For example is fishing the backbone of the Greenlandic economy, counting for around 94% of their export value. Most countries rely on other means, where fishing is not very important.

    The map on the rights shows the Arctic. The Arctic Ocean is aligned with the Pacific Ocean and the Atlantic Ocean.

    The northwestern part of the Pacific is near Alaska but the northeastern part goes from Russia and all the way to Japan.

    The Atlantic Ocean northwestern part is around Canada and the USA, but also stretches up to Greenland.

    The Atlantic´ northeastern part stretches to Europe, to Portugal and up to Russia where the Arctic Ocean takes over.